It is extremely unrealistic you to definitely like choice is a result of the employment of matchmaking apps
- PLoS You to. 2021; 16(2): e0246350. »
- Author response to Decision Letter 0
First of all, we need to thank new editor therefore the reviewers for your time and effort dedicated to examining that it manuscript. The statements had been very useful to alter our very own work.
From our views, we are not if relationship software explore could affect mating direction
Playing with a large take to off solitary Spanish college students (n = 902) which report investigates just how individual variations in mating positioning changes between those people having fun with dating software and you may low-users. My understanding of one’s introduction is because they need certainly to evaluate the partnership anywhere between mating quick-title and you can long-identity orientations and also the accessibility dating software. In lieu of deciding on circumstances which can change the accessibility relationship apps once the learned in the prior literary works, they predict choice for very long-label and you will brief-label mating positioning regarding use of relationship programs. Specifically, they regress years gender, sexual positioning, and the entry to matchmaking apps toward SOI-Roentgen, SOI-Conclusion, SOI-Attitudes, and you may SOI-Desire, and you may Long-title Mating Orientation (LTMO). Elizabeth.grams., on the abstract it is said that there were zero variations in new enough time-title direction since a function of play with/non-use. I’ve found that it problematic regarding a theoretic area, because they frequently believe that dating app use https://kissbrides.com/american-women/pembroke-pines-fl/ can affect mating positioning as opposed to the almost every other means doing. Mating direction as mentioned that have SOI-Roentgen and you may MSOI try steps from choice and identification properties.
Response: We wish to give thanks to Reviewer 1 towards some time work purchased examining the manuscript as well as for their/their unique comments. The suggestions was indeed very useful to change our very own performs.
Throughout the study nearly step one/step 3 of one’s college students was basically classified as actually sexual minority
Thank you for the opportunity to explain this time. All of our search objective is to try to make sure if the you will find differences between users and you will low-pages regarding relationships applications within the mating orientations (short-identity and you will much time-term). I have tried to make this clearer because of the switching the new name of one’s manuscript, that is now “Do more youthful relationships app pages and non-profiles differ in mating orientations?”. Within investigation, zero specific causality (identity programs fool around with or apps explore personality) is intended. Having a mix-sectional construction, we can’t expose people. I’ve used the data that people envision that is better suitable for response to all of our browse concern. Throughout the Abstract (p. dos, traces 29-33), as an instance, we typed:
It was unearthed that, while dating software pages had increased small-term mating positioning than just non-users (more regular behavior, highest attention, and a lot more positive attitude), there were no differences in new much time-identity positioning while the a purpose of have fun with/non-use.
Right here, including all through new manuscript, i’ve exhibited the outcome since detailed, maybe not which have one certain expectation off factors and you will effects.
The procedure point provides an excellent effect of try characteristics. The take to out of youngsters appear to diverge somewhat off a broad pupil populace with regard to this new ratio away from low-heterosexual children. This is simply not chatted about throughout the data constraints (decreased representativeness).
Response: Many thanks really for the comments and you can suggestion. All of our attempt is so different from that studies achieved various other geographic and you can social contexts, that have a top ratio off players from sexual minorities. not, we are not knowing throughout the why this needs to be an indication out of run out of regarding representativeness, regardless of if, for certain, we in addition to you should never verify representativeness of our take to. Brand new sampling because of it data try equivalent otherwise much like the fresh new testing off prior knowledge from the same search classification (see Table below).